Friday, May 7, 2010
Broken Social Scene, 'Forgiveness Rock Record': IRR
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Breaking Bad S3: Midseason thoughts
I once heard TV critic Tim Goodman say that BB has on of the biggest 0-60 starts of any television show he could remember; I agree with him. Those first few episodes of season one move with breakneck speed that your hoping for things to slow down a bit just to catch your breath. The first season came to an abrupt end (thanks writers strike) after only seven episodes. Season two did a great job of picking up where we left off and and adding new layers to this drama. We were introduced to a flash forward (I guess that's a thing now) storytelling device every couple of episodes that eerily foretold a grim future for the inhabitants of the White's backyard. It was rewarding to see how creator Vince Gilligan and his writing crew carefully pace a season all leading up to moments none of us expected. It seems many I talk to are on the fence about the plane crash and the "butterfly effect" aspect of Walt's actions. However, for me the real cliff hanger was Skylar leaving Walt. Anyway, that is all season two stuff; there are a few things I want to say about season three!
A lot of digital ink has been typed regarding Walt, Skylar, and Jesse. I want to highlight a few other things about this show that make it so interesting to watch.
From the moment season three begins it is hard not to notice a giant leap in production value. Not that the shows production was bad to begin with but there seems to be a greater attention to detail, especially when it comes to landscape and space. The stagnant shots of ABQ and surrounding areas are very rich and really create a sense of space. The season begins with a sequence containing people in a remote Mexican village crawling to a hut where we see a drawing of the great Heisenberg. Two menacing twins in not so menacing shark skin suits lead the pack and pay their respects in the hut by vowing to kill Heisenberg (I think).
Speaking of the twins, I'm not sure how I feel about them. Like Saul Goodman last year I think the twins are a little too much of a character. Saul felt out of place last season. The way Bob Odenkirk played the smarmy lawyer seemed too much like an SNL character. Having said that, the joke may be on me. This season we are learning that there is more to Saul than what we see and perhaps Saul is playing a character. I don't think that is the case with the twins though. They are creepy but there are things about them that seem too cliche: the matching suits, the non-conventional weapon (ax), their expressionless faces. Next thing you know they will walk away from an explosion without even being bothered enough to turn around and look (wait, that did happen). I'm just saying, these guys walk into a fast food restaurant and you know they are up to no good. When they stepped into Los Pollos Hermanos they looked so out of place the manager was immediately suspicious and so were we. Even if I think they may be too cliche bad guys, they still are pretty badass and the confrontation last week between Hank and the twins was epic.
Hank. Dean Norris has graciously been given so much to work with this season and the show is better for it. Although I'm sure he wont get any Emmy love for his work this season that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve it. Norris's Hank knows how to walk the line between fun guy's guy and a tortured shell of his former self. I've found his storyline to be one of the most interesting this season. The last couple of episodes have revolved mostly around him and whenever he is involved Walt is inadvertently involved as well. I've always said that Breaking Bad is all working towards the showdown that is going to happen when Hank finds out that Walter is Heisenberg. Imagine my shock when the ep "Sunset" set up such a close call. When Walt and Jesse were in the trailer with Hank outside I truly had no idea what was going to happen. I surely didn't think Walt was going to orchestrate a call to Hank informing him that his wife had been injured in an accident. The conflict between staying to finally nab Jesse or leaving him to be by his wife's side was a real conundrum for Hank and he made the right choice to leave; except it was the wrong choice. The look on Hanks face when he finds out he's been duped was terrifying and you just knew Jesse was going to get it. And boy did he get it. The next ep "One Minute" starts with Hank beating Jesse to a pulp and ends with Hanks near death experience. I know I am prone to hyperbole but that showdown in the parking lot between the twins and Hank was some of the most intense couple of minutes that I have ever seen on television. Usually in moments like this on TV you are confident that one of your main guys will live but when Hank was panicking in his car I really thought it was the end of him. That episode felt like a season finale!
The first season often employed the "jump ahead" device by showing us up front what was going to happen in the end of the episode causing us to guess how they'd get there. The second season often used the "flash forward" device to vaguely show us what will happen at the end of the season. Now in the third season the writers have taken to the "flash back" device. So far we have seen scenes of: the twins when they were boys; how Danny Trejo met his demise, and what Jesse did with the money Walt gave him to buy an RV. It is interesting to see a show (other than Lost) employ so many narrative devices. It makes me wonder what they will do next season. Which gets me wondering...
How long do you think this show can/should go on? One nice thing is that the show has really managed to keep a pretty small time line since day one. I haven't researched this but I don't think more than a year has gone by (in the story) since the pilot. It's possible this show could go on a couple more seasons and still be realistic because of the time line. As long as Gilligan and company keep telling the story they set out to tell than we are lucky.
The first half of this season has been spectacular and if the second half is as good we are in for a treat. If it wasn't already Breaking Bad is rapidly becoming one of my top ten, all time favorite shows, which is pretty impressive when you figure the amount they have accomplished in only 27 episodes.
Other thoughts:
- What do you think of Walt's new/ex lab partner Gale played wonderfully by David Costabile? Is it possible that he is/was there to learn enough of Walt's great meth recipe to render Walt disposable for Gus? If not, Walt kind of sucks for firing him.
- What do you think about Jesse this season? Kind of whiny if you ask me; not that he doesn't have any reason to be whiny. I just like the other Jesse better.
- I feel like a jerk saying this but Skylar's is kind of a b. It's hard to blame her for her reaction to finding out Walt's secret but man she is not making good decisions.
- R.J. Mitte who plays Finn/Walt Jr. has really aged in the last two years. I guess that is one challenge doing a show as linear as BB. Mad Men ran into the same problem with the Draper's son Bobby (I think).
Friday, April 30, 2010
The Hold Steady, 'Heaven is Whenever': IRR
My review of The Hold Steady's new album Heaven is Whenever is up this morning on indierockreviews.com. You can read the review here. Check it out and let me know if I am crazy for (kind of) being (a little) disappointed. The album drops on May 4th.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Glee does Springsteen
Last night on Glee we heard their first attempt at a Bruce Springsteen song; the result was not that bad. The Boss didn't get the full episode treatment like Madonna, however, his song was in the opening few minutes of "Home." I had heard rumblings for awhile that Glee creator Ryan Murphy had been gunning to have a Springsteen song on his musical TV series. Many Boss message boards were all worked up trying to predict what song Murphy would select for his cast of misfits to perform. My guess was "Dancing in the Dark." Can't you just see Finn singing in the classroom and then gesturing to Rachel to get up and dance with him Courtney Cox style? In fact I could have guessed 25 BS songs before "Fire." When I found out that was the song I was surprised; even more I was impressed. I don't think anyone guessed "Fire." The song isn't even on an album proper. It was a live show favorite and was finally included on the great three disc/record set Live 1975-85. Legend has it that Springsteen wrote it for Elvis; that would have been awesome. A few prominent people have covered the song but I think it is safe to say it isn't one his most popular songs.
"Fire" is a short, sexy song about unrequited love. He is singing to a girl who is playing games with him :"Well your kisses they burn, but your heart stays cool." Springsteen name checks star-crossed lovers like Romeo & Juliet and Samson & Delilah. He sings about the passion between the two famous couples and how he and his muse can too be like those forbidden lovers. So would you pair R&J, S&D with Will & April? Probably not. They are not a couple and there is no real sexual tension between the two. If it was Will & Emma, that would be different; their relationship is more complicated and therefore "hot." Since Will and Emma have only kissed; lack of intimacy makes the song more powerful and you can bet when they kiss, "fire." Plus the song isn't a duet and having it as a duet is kind of confusing. Are they singing from one POV or two? But it doesn't matter, it was cute. I'm worried I'm sounding too much like Kara on American Idol talking about the meaning of the lyrics; oh well.
If Ryan Murphy wants to use more Springsteen songs lets hope they are as unpredictable as "Fire" was. My prayer is that next season there is a new character named Rosalita that Finn can sing to "Come out tonight!"
For fun here is a quick video of Robin Williams singing "Fire." It gets me every time!
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Justified: Midseason thoughts
Tonight's episode "Blind Spot" marks the midway point for FX's new original series Justified. I have mixed feelings about the season so far. However, the good far outweighs the bad and I have no intention of bailing on the series just yet.
Whenever I approach a new show I do so with a little trepidation. I was nervous not knowing what type of show Justified would be. After watching the pilot I was hooked because it seemed to be a show right up my alley, a serialized drama. I was more than a little disappointed in the second and third episode which acted as stand alone episodes that didn't follow up on the stories from the pilot.
See, I know my viewing habits and I am not one to jump in on the middle of the show. If there is a show I am late coming to, I have no problem waiting for the DVD to catch up. I have to start at the beginning. I think of it the same way I think about reading a book. I don't just open up a novel and begin on chapter twelve. No, I start at the beginning and pray that I am not waiting my time. In the past most shows featured interesting character studies that revolved around a "case of the week" format (think Law & Order). After each episode the clock was reset and if you happened to miss an episode or two it didn't affect the narrative. Those types of shows were fine in their day, but for me, in order to grab my attention stories need to be told in an arc and keep me looking forward to the next installment. I guess I just prefer my TV serialized rather than procedural. In fact I can't think of a drama I watch that isn't serialized. I guess House is a mixture of both but that is about as far as I will go. I need a reason to tune in the next week, something to think about during the time in between episodes. The idea of everything being tied up in a bow at the end of each episode just isn't interesting to me. Justified seems to be walking the line more than I would hope. Six episodes in, Justified has a great story arc with characters and stories that I want to spend time with. Unfortunately, we haven't spent enough time with the stories that interest me the most. So here is where I stand: I just need to know what to expect and then be at peace with it. Because just when I think I have the show pegged as a procedural they throw in an episode like "The Lord of War and Thunder" to get me all excited about the narrative again.
The pilot, which for the record is near perfect, did a great job of setting the right tone (down to the awesome credits/theme song btw) for the series and establishing a character that is as mysterious as he is flawed. Timothy Olyphant brings the same intensity (and cowboy hat) to the character of US Marshall Raylan Givens as he did to Sheriff Seth Bullock in Deadwood. Except with Raylan, Olyphant provides an infectious charm that masks his inner demons. Olyphant brings both ease and danger to the character that makes watching a confrontation with him captivating. An example is given in the first five minutes when Raylan keeps up on a promise he made to a criminal to kill him if he doesn't get out of town in 24 hours. The episode, based on and named after Elmore Leonard's short story "Ace in the Hole" (Raylan also appears in his books "Pronto" and "Riding the Rap"), could work as a stand alone movie but it sets up so many possible stories to follow that you are glad it's a TV series. The pilot was filmed on location in Kentucky and you can tell. It looks beautiful in HD from the lush green foliage to the paint chipping off a decrepit house. I was kind of disappointed to learn that the rest of the series is filmed in California but oh well. Raylan is forced to return to his hometown for work and that sets up one my favorite narrative devices: prodigal son going back to the town he vowed to never return to. Raylan seems to have run away from his family, friends and past. Returning to that environment makes him uneasy and it seems he is going to have to face some things/people that he is not prepared to face.After a stellar first episode the next two offerings are fairly forgettable and kill the momentum set up in the pilot. I was loosing interest but then came the episode which featured Alan Ruck as a sadistic dentist running from the mob and my interest was piqued. The episode was not part of the long arc but it worked as a stand alone piece. It featured Raylan on a mission to California to chase an old criminal that had jilted him a few years back. The action worked as a modern western and the storytelling was anything but generic. It caused me to change my mind and expectations about what to think of the series as a whole. Maybe the whole procedural aspect isn't that bad if it is done right. The fifth episode, however, blew the lid off the overall story arc and really got me hooked. We finally get to met Raylan's father of whom we have heard so much about. Arlo Givens, played masterfully by Raymond J. Barry, is a perfect contrast to his sons contained anger. Arlo seems to have no self control and unbridled anger and Raylan is trying desperately to not be his father. Episode six brought us back to the "case of the week" format but teases us a little with some great scenes between Raylan and his ex-wife. The previews for tonight's episode promise the return of Walter Goggins' character Boyd Crowder. In the pilot Boyd was set up to be the great antagonist to Raylan but he has been locked up for a while with only small scenes here and there. There is a lot of potential for Goggins' character and I hope they include him more often in the story.
Another reason to check out Justified would be the great guest stars that have appeared so far: Buster from Arrested Development, Tim Riggins' dad from FNL, Herc from FNL, Sanka from Cool Runnings, Cameron Frye from Ferris Bueller, and Livingston Dell from Oceans 11.I am really interested to see where this series is headed. A good sign that I'm on board with the show is I have dusted off my Raylan Givens centric Elmore Leonard novels. I'm rereading them picturing Olyphant as Givens and hoping that they draw more from these novels in future seasons. I like when a show gets me excited like this.
Monday, April 26, 2010
About the blog title.
Other titles I considered:
watch anything...
Does This Blog Stop At 82nd Street?
This Blog is Real!
Stuff That's Not Important
My Trivial Pursuit
The Cult of Pop
What Would Tim Riggins Do?
See Ben Watch
Popular Aptitude
Almost An Expert
Well, I went with "Born To Review" and I'm going to stick with it. I am hoping to use this blog as an outlet for all of the pop culture I consume and don't know what to do with. Feel free to join in on the conversation by leaving comments and suggestions. Just be civil.